The new slate of Apple Silicon chips is super confusing. With an M1 iMac you may be thinking that with the M4s out you need a new machine since you're falling behind, but that is not the case. Maybe you spent a ton of money on an M1 Ultra Mac Studio and you are thinking an M4 Max may be better. The truth is not so simple, but let's see if we can make it so.
All M-Series chips no matter what series or type are vastly superior to any of the old Intel machines. Even the humble M1 is immensely powerful and more than capable to handle what you initially purchased it to do. Any of them will handle Apple Intelligence if and when it is released. It can edit hi-res photos and even handle 8K video editing.
So what about the Pro, Max, and Ultra variants? It's all about the cores. More processing cores mean a faster and more capable chip. The Max has more than the Pro, and the Ultra is basically two Max chips fused together. That means an M1 Ultra is faster and more capable than an M2 Max, and the new M4 Max is pokier than the M3 Ultra.
Trying to explain this makes me sound like a crazy person. So how do we distill it down to something that is actionable and can save us all time and money. Well, look at it like this: If you have any M Series powered Mac computer there is no reason to upgrade unless you want a new machine, need more storage, physically broke the thing, or started using software that needs a bit more power.
That being said, if you have an Intel-powered Mac you absolutely want to consider upgrading. Apple desperately wants to leave those machines in the rear view. The newer systems like macOS Sequoia are optimized for Apple Silicon.
With the vast array of options, if you do think of replacing that old Intel, it's important to look at what you will need. There is no reason to overbuy since the new chips are so powerful, but storage and the proper number of "cores" in your use case are extremely important. And since everything is now integrated on the chip itself, don't forget the AppleCare+. |